Divide and conquer, the typical scenario.

Througout the nation's history, there has always been the old standard of divide and conquer, and sadly, it keeps working. 90 percent of the world's wealth is controlled by 10 percent of its citizens, while the remainder of the population scrambles for the 10 percent of resources. In the United States of America, the Proletariat has always been the indigent and the enslaved people. When you look at it , this nation didn't really have equailty. It started with slavery. In the beginning, the first slaves used were the indentured white servants from Europe. Later on, blacks were used. When you have a group of people who are unhappy, what do you have the threat of? A rebellion. There is always the threat of a rebellion. What did the elites do? The raised the status of some of the proletariat, usually indentured white servants. The reason was to give the proletariat someone else to fight with, rather than the elite population. They used other people to protect them. The persons who moved up might gain more wealth, but they will never achieve the status the elites will have. The concept of race was used to keep the black slaves down. The slave owners were afraid that if the white indentured servants started to realize they had more in common with the black population then they did with the elite population, there would be a rebellionand the elite would lose their control and status. The elites used the indentured servants as pawns by using race as a tool. Their motive was "you're white, we're white. We have something in common. If you keep the slaves in line and do some things for us, you'll move on up and you have a bit more, not much more, but you'll have more than they do and more than what you have now." That is a classic example of divide and conquer. A possible peasant rebellion was put to a stop by divide and conquer. Race was used to divide people. That is what happened. This use was put into practice during the Civil War. The slave owners didn't want to let go of their slaves. They even said they were prepared to fight to keep their slaves and secede. They used farmers and poor white people to fight the war for them, people who didn't even own slaves. Slavery was an issue used. Nowadays we say states rights. Of course it was states right. The people living in the Southern states didn't want people in the North telling them they couldn't own slaves. The irony was that slavery was abolished anyway. Divide and conquer. I am not here to sat that capitalism is a bad thing. I am here to say that whenever there is cruelty and corruption and the persons who control the resources don't want to relinquish that privilege, they will use the old standby of divide and conquer to keep the people living on the bottom rungs of society from standing up against the oppresion of not having equal access to resources.

Politics and the role of race.

I am not going to even attempt mincing any words. Race has played a part of USA politics since the day it became a nation. Politics has been used to exclude certain members of American society based on their race. Many decisions have been made on the basis of race. Plessy v Ferguson, many anti-miscegenation laws, many other acts of cruelty, the institution of slavery. Fast forward to the 1960's. Race is at the forefront of American politics. With leaders such as Dr. King and Malcolm X coming into the equation, many issues, such as discrimination had to be addressed. No one could ignore it anymore. You couldn't ignore the black population or try to exclude them anymore because they were standing up and saying "I will not take anymore crap anymore". Dr. King wrote about how blacks cannot wait anymore for their rights to come, they needed to stand up and fight for it. That is the reason blacks in this nation can vote and why they have political rights. They have them because they stood up for themselves and fought back. That was the 1960's. Today, there are still other issues, such as poverty, poor medical care, poor educational standards, and other issues. Few people want to talk about these issues. These issues do affect people of all races and ethnicities. The issue that makes it particularly bad for African-Americans is that they suffer from it more than anyone else and have suffered more than anyone else. Black Americans are more likely to be born into neighborhoods with higher poverty rates, higher crime rates, higher drop-out rates, higher rates of unemployment. The question is "what role does politics have in this"? Here is the answer. Historically, blacks have been the ones excluded to the extremes. The ancestors of African-Americans didn't choose to come to the USA. There was no "come to America and find a better life". They were brought here as slaves, to do work and not benefit from the fruits of that labor. If you were a slave, you were not allowed to know how to read or right. In some places, slaves or even free people of color, were not allowed to own firearms. Why? One thing a slave owner is afraid of is a rebellion from his slaves. And there were many slave rebellions in the USA. None of them were successful. Whenever the slave revolts were supressed, punishments were harsh and usually included death. If you were plotting to incite a slave rebellion, you could be executed. Most Blacks were pretty much condemned to be slaves. There was no plan to make the slaves free in most places. If you could read and write and you had a gun, your slave owner had no power of you. The instituion of slavery in the USA was a pathology of control and greed. Greed because you don't pay a slave, and control because you are trying to keep the slave a slave through means of fear and ignorance. If a slave was ignorant and scared, happiness didn't have to be considered. American politics frequently wrestled with the subject of slavery. In the end, slavery ended, not peacefully, but with a war, the Civil War. Many slave owners stood up and said they were prepared to fight and secede from the Union in order to keep their slaves. In the end, the South lost and was put under military control in a period of time known was Reconstuction. Sure, blacks gained voting rights, but most blacks were illiterate, a sad by-product of slavery. The Ku Klux Klan formed out of Reconstruction by a former Confederate soldier. The KKK later resorted to intimidation of blacks to keep them from exercising their rights. That is a pathology of control. When Reconstruction ended, blacks were relegated to a status of second-class citizenship. Slavery may have been abolished, but many in the South did not want blacks to have the same rights and privileges as whites. Race played a role in politics. How does it play a role today? Under many laws, blacks were restricted in what they could do. Separate schools according the law in amny states, and other laws were meant to keep blacks from progressing in American society, because for the most part, blacks were not wanted in American society. Out of this, many institutions were formed. Historically black colleges/universities came out of this because it had to be. Many colleges/universities would not welcome blacks. Many businesses had to form and even business practices afforded few, if any, to become wealthy. In many places, if black businesses competed with the local white businesses, there were severe consequences. When those restrictions finally ended in the 1960's the damage was already done. Inferior schools, many to the government's lack of concern, caused a gap in education, along with other issues in education. Due to certain Black Codes, it was considered against custom for a black person to behave as being more educated than a white person. Strangely enough, many of the Black Codes have had a very disturbing effect of African-Americans in the form of self-destruction. It is true that African-Americans committ a higher proportion of violent crime than other ethnic groups. The question is, who are the African-American criminals going after? The answer is other African-Americans. That behavior has been passed down from the days of Jim Crow. Blacks who did anything to whites were usually punished harsher than if white persons were to do something bad to black persons. Blacks committing crimes against other blacks were usually brushed off. What happened? Blacks leared from process of elimination that they could hurt each other and get away with it.

Do We Use The Stimulus Plan or Not?

Ever since the election of Obama, there has been some heated debate about the stimulus plan. Some people say that the stimulus plan is a great idea, saying that it will jumpstart the economy and create more jobs. Some people have very negative views on it, stating that it is a waste of money and that the government should not get involved in such a situation. I look at the stimulus plan from this perspective: Who is going to bail the people out? The people need jobs. The people need the money. I can relate. I am out of work right now and I am in college. This brings me to another question: Where is the money really going? Personally, I don't know. If there is a way to know, please let me know, because I don't know. That is another part of government that is scary. Few people know where the money is going to. The people have a right to know where their tax dollars are going. How is the stimulus really helping the economy? I am not saying that the government shouldn't help out. In fact, I believe that the government should help out in a situation where the economy is going through hard times. With that said, there should be some accountability to where that money is going. People are in need of job, NOW! Some people would say that we are a step closer to socialism now. Well, how do we know if the economy would come back? The Great Depression required some intervention from the government. This isn't that much more different than then. Furthermore, what about Bush? He spent so much money on a war that does not seem to end. What were the fruits of that labor? Not much. Money that could have been spent helping the USA economy goes toward a war that should have been fought a better way. I just want to see some results for this and more attention paid to the people.

First Entry of The Political Shift

This is the first post of this blog: The Political Shift. Politics in the United States of America has given the same result: Politicians who talk big and do very little for this nation. Politicians who speak from a political ideology that helps no one. The Republican Party and the Democratic Party are not that much different from one another. The difference is that they are both fighting each other to gain votes. Politics is said to be a dirty game. Well, it was made a dirty game by people who have self-serving interests in mind. With that said, there needs to be a new shift in the way politics is conducted. All of the issues need to be looked at from the perspective of practical solutions. The politician is suppose to be a public servant, not someone who is out for self-interest. A new political party should be formed. What needs to be done is to look at all of the issues and handle those issues according to what is right. Neither party has looked at that. Rather than handle one issue or the other, what needs to happen is a collective consensus.